Search results

I will stick with 3.5. I personally don't feel like pumping more $ into Wizards pocket. After collecting over 20 hardbacks for 3.5 . I don't want to wait 6 more years for 4e to flesh out. I am comfortable with 3.5 and my players state emphatically they will not purchase 4e .

a couple of pirated milk crates for books / notes etc and a couple GW figure cases for "go figure" FIGURES pun intended

I agree most of them are quite sound but my group has really enjoyed Red Hand of doom so far They also liked this one that you didn't mention Sons of Gruumsh it is a forgotten realms adventure but easily adaptable to any world IMO

get rid of the gimmicky weapons like whips and spiked chains its swords and sorcery gosh darn it

A friend that I played Avalon Hill board games with came back from WinterWar Con all excited. " Dude you got to try this new game (D&D) its like playing Lord of the Rings Man! It was all over , we rarely played our old Avalon Hill stuff after that. And that was over 30 years ago

Mine too the maps are Judges Guild/CityStates with different scale and political boundarys but 99% of the NPCs are all original and several different campaigns Dungeons are here there and everywhere. I only have 1 original dungeon and its yet to be found

Our D&D group still has 3 players from 1979 and 4 more from 1982 still playing together in 2007. Until last year we still were using/playing characters going back to "82". Kudo's to you because I know how hard it is.

Of 9 players in my campaign only 2 have used Prestige classes 1 is a radiant servant of Pelor and the other is a warpriest

I ran it as a RPGA judge years ago. I think it was a bit too structured and forced for my taste. But that was R3 maybe as a mega module it is a bit more free form.

I think the 2 levels of ranger are wasted since you don't get the rapid shot until the 2nd ranger level. Better to use those 2 levels as fighter levels since you can take rapid shot feat as the bonus fighter feat or better still weapon specialization plus you get the d10 for hp and you will...

I feel sorceror is the best choice using only PHB classes as a base. 1st of all some race needs to have it as a base and if you claim gnomes have a magical nature it fits the bill better than bard. To be honest if you really use LoTR as your guide hobbits/halflings would be better suited as...

MIdnight 2nd Ed Traveller any obvious omissions from the list

Mindflayer needs it because in a campaign with out psionics they just are too broken

I totally agree with 3.0/3.5 making 2nd is not a chore at all. I also used 20000 xp to start my Old 1st/2nd ed game for the same reasons as it was never fun to spend months making 2nd level.

All Psionics classes must die but the Artificer must go 1st

I have 9 players which at times can be a chore but when it comes to schedualing as long as 6 can make the game the game goes on . One thing it does allow for is the opportunity for players to play whatever they want instead of getting the " WE REALLY NEED A BLANK" that used to happen all the...

Current group 8 players 3 plan on prestige classes a radiant servant of Pelor a war priest of Pelor and a dwarven defender

I have never had a player seriously want to play a paladin in my game in the 20+ years I have DMed. Actually the movers and shakers in the player pool have more or less made it clear they do not want the restrictions that having a paladin PC would bring. This is from a group that tends towards...

not anymore Last October I got a chance to rejoin a campaign I had played in years before that was more or less a 1st or 2nd ed game. It has been running for over 20 years that I know. So after 1 session I had to tell the dm thanks but no thanks when asked if I wanted to become a regular...

Hated it. No need for a scifi theme in D&D. Played like a bad gamma world module but then was there ever a "good" gamma world module?