Maggan
Writer for CY_BORG, Forbidden Lands and Dragonbane
And since I see that you are a real game designer involved with real game companies and publishers, I will defer to your expertise.![]()
Oooh, dangerous! Dangerous! Thanks for the vote of confidence, but trust me, just because I work part time in the industry, doesn't mean I'm not also just a fan with a chip on my shoulder!

Case in point: I didn't think WotC would fumble the DDI, having learned a lesson with MasterTools. Boy was I wrong on that!
However, what about this polarization with customers, and with 3PP? Did it seem this bad with 2E to 3E (except with 3PP - I don't think there really was a 3PP market until 3E)? Or do you feel this is a non-issue? I'm interested in your opinion of this aspect.
3e had another set of circumstances; 2e was waning, had been waning for a long time. And it was so bad at TSR that Dragon and Dungeon had stopped being published for a long time. So people knew how bad it could be, which made it a lot easier to roll out 3e.
Having said that, there are polarisation in regards to everything D&D. It is inherent in the nature of doing edition changes. WFRPv1 and WFRPv2 are in all respects identical games if you compare them to D&D3 and D&D4, and yet that edition change, relaunching a commerically abandoned edition, polarised the community to a certain degree.
It is inevitable that there are strong feelings now, and I remember the strong feelings when 3.5 was released. That blew over, and now 3.5 is the edition that many feel attached to.
It all goes round and round.
Cheers!
/M