Ahnehnois
First Post
There is a certain homogenization that occurs as a consequence of 3e's epic level rules. At that level, your character's class abilities constitute a relatively small portion of what you can do. However, in general, there is a modest advantage for nonmagical characters because of several factors.All that is presumably just as available to the 37th-level wizard, so I figured it was a wash, and that it was their differing class abilities that would be relevant.
Ability scores tend to be better placed for nonmagical characters. Social constraints (i.e. people are likely to treat you better if you aren't a spellcaster). Efficiency of item usage.
True, but on the other hand, if we're talking about a human with the standard array of ability scores, the standard gold allotment, 37 levels of just fighter, and no other special perks, that human is a straw man. An actual character should not be and generally is not built so simply. Part of 3e is that multiclassing and other forms of customization are de rigeur. Maybe fighter 20/wizard 17 is one way that could go, but there are tons and tons of ways to spend all those levels and associated resources.But if the argument is "a 37th-level fighter can keep up with a 37th-level wizard if the fighter is also actually a wizard", then maybe their class abilities are a wash too, so, yeah, I guess they would be pretty evenly matched.
Perhaps more realistically, I should state that a tricked out character with fighter levels but also with a monstrous race and custom-built artifacts and fancy prestige class abilities and so one is roughly equal to a tricked out prestige classed wizard or cleric with similar benefits.