Monk, just feels out of place in setting
Just make him more empowered Friar Tuck rather than Bruce Lee. Just remember to go full tonsure.
Monk, just feels out of place in setting
For 5E, it has to be the monk.
I really like the class concept, and I know that it's fairly balanced around the concept of having high Dex and Wisdom at the expense of Strength, but it just feels wrong to punch for 1d8+5 when I have a Strength of 8. Monks are supposed to be the physically strongest class, not the weakest.
My local AL game I was running had 3 regular bards, and maybe half of the drop-in players ran bards. It totally works to have more than one.
You're not a fantasy monk, though. A fantasy monk, as I perceive them, should be able to punch through a brick wall with a straight punch. Monks should have super strength, as a result of their special training, which lets them hit harder with their fist than an ogre does with a greatclub.Hardest punch I ever "threw" in real life was simply putting my fist out and walking through a person's space while flexing my knees and allowing the full force of my body weight to move into them.
Sometimes hitting isn't about raw strength.
For me, it's warlock. Each time I get an idea I grab the PHB and sigh...no again. What class does that to you?
I used to think I could never like the druid. Then I reread the description in the AD&D2e PHB. It changes everything.
Rogue. In theory, I really want to play it. But the few times I get to play, there’s always something else that grabs my attention.