• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Chainmail Bikinis & other Cheesecake art in the 4th Edition Core Books.

What do you feel about "cheesecake" art in the D&D IV core books?

  • Strongly Favor!

    Votes: 107 24.3%
  • Moderately Favor

    Votes: 49 11.1%
  • Slightly Favor

    Votes: 38 8.6%
  • Indifferent

    Votes: 62 14.1%
  • Slightly Oppose

    Votes: 38 8.6%
  • Moderately Oppose

    Votes: 60 13.6%
  • Strongly Oppose!

    Votes: 52 11.8%
  • 3.14159265358979323846…

    Votes: 35 7.9%

Mr. Wilson

Explorer
Don't care one way or the other. I suppose less overtly sexual images depicting hawt babes wouldn't hurt bringing in new females, but I'm more worried about the ones being driven off by fellow gamers who can't help but stare at females, make rude comments, or immediately assume the female is their one true love.

Those people scare me.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Jhulae said:
Might want to qualify that some, because that's really an overgeneralization there.

I've never been alienated by 'cheesecake art', and as others have said, women they know haven't been either.

So, while it may alienate 'some' women gamers, unlike your statement, it doesn't alienate 'all' women gamers.

I didn't intend to make a blanket statement. Without an indicator like 'some' or 'all,' I'd assume people would interpret it as 'some.' Likewise if I'd said "I love cookies," I think it's clear that in general I like cookies. Though there are exceptions. (Peanut butter cookies, for instance.)

Cheesecake art alienates some women gamers.

There's a difference between tastefully beautiful images with a hint of fun, and shameless, puerile cheesecake.

This I'm cool with:
i6.jpg




This I am not:
jc_dangergirl.jpg

(Well, at least not in my game products.)
 

Kaffis

First Post
am181d said:
So the consensus is... no consensus. (Though I'd suggest that anything that less than 50% of the market supports shouldn't be there...)

Either side has to dip into the indifferent to muster 50% (even after excising the "I like Pi" option). That said, both sides are pretty close, though favor has a slight edge and is more heavily weighted to strong than moderate.
 


delericho

Legend
If the cheesecake art is proving a barrier to women joining the hobby (and it may be having a slight effect), then I think I would prefer it to be gone from the D&D core rulebooks. However, I'm not particularly offended by it.

I definately don't want to see silly "stab here" armour designs, though.
 

I think Claudio's Image #2 and #3 hit it just right for a D&D product. I love Image #1 the most of course because I have that all-important male XY gene pairing and the classic response to visual stimuli.
 


Varianor Abroad said:
I think Claudio's Image #2 and #3 hit it just right for a D&D product. I love Image #1 the most of course because I have that all-important male XY gene pairing and the classic response to visual stimuli.

Three's fine, two's actually really good, if 4e showed that much character and action I'd be really happy. First one looks like a "Julia Roberts from pretty woman" dressed up in fantasy gear, if that's what it's representing, then sure, whatever, but that's not really appropriate for a D&D manual.

(self edited for granma speak)
 
Last edited:

Wormwood

Adventurer
Cheesecake is strongly bound to fantasy fiction.

I'm not like Lovecraft, who would tear off the more lurid Wierd Tales covers.
 

Dausuul

Legend
I'm fine with sexy women in the PHB, but I feel like there's a line between "sexy" and "thinly disguised porn." It's hard to define exactly where that line is; but I think a lot of it derives from clothing that is obviously impractical for any purpose except looking sexy.

For example, I've got no problem with a portrayal of a female warrior in loincloth and leather halter (see Klaus's picture #2). Most people would prefer a little more protection, but if you don't want to be encumbered by armor and are in a fairly warm climate, it's not unreasonable.

On the other hand, put the same woman in pauldrons, greaves, gorget, vambraces, helm, and half a breastplate, with exposed midriff, cleavage, and a metal G-string (see Klaus's picture #1), and I have problems. Put her in a suggestive pose, and I have more problems. That outfit is providing all the drawbacks of armor--weight, loss of mobility, expense--with none of the benefits.

Similarly, high heels on adventuring women are ridiculous, at least while they're actually adventuring.
 

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top