You still haven't linked one.
You have made an unsupported claim, while asserting that I declared ScreenRant reputable.
No I didn't.
You are just pouting that you got caught in a Lie falsely claiming that I said this:
The individual claimed that there are industry insiders saying that the movie failed/flopped.
And you know you lied, as you are slyly trying to move the goal posts by going back to an even older post of mine trying to score 'gotcha' points again.
But I'll come back to that.
You say that this was an unsupported claim:
There are already a few articles declaring D&D to be a flop.
I confess that it didn't occur to me that holding people's hand because they might be completely incapable of doing a simple search on the D&D film with the word 'Flop" in it was a requirement.
That quote you are using wasn't in reply to you, but nevertheless:
Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves opens next week with its box office predicted to massively bomb, even worse than Shazam, a similar goofy comedic movie.
cosmicbook.news
Shazam 2 isn't the king of flop mountain anymore! Another blockbuster has fought hard to wrestle the title from the DC film!
www.giantfreakinrobot.com
Paramount Pictures' Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves will more than likely be a flop despite its opening weekend bringing in more than original predictions. However, it's big budget will likely keep it from making money.
boundingintocomics.com
Here's one about D&D Flopping in China:
'Dungeons & Dragons' opened to just $5 million while Sony's '65' debuted to $600,000, adding to worries that the Chinese audience may be losing its enthusiasm for many U.S. studio films.
www.hollywoodreporter.com
Any claim of what articles are, or are not, 'reputable' are irrelevant.
As that would be a Textbook
Appeal to Authority Logical fallacy.
You have made an unsupported claim, while asserting that I declared ScreenRant reputable.
I made no such assertation.
Please quote where I specifically said that
you declared; "ScreenRant was reputable..."
Oh, wait.
You Can't.
Because it is obvious to anyone reading our exchange that I did not.
So you are
lying and making false claims again.
You are completely unable to refute any of the factual points I have made. You are a one note singer continually circling around trying for a rhetorical 'gotcha'.
This is now the second time you got busted making demonstrably false claims about things I posted.
But getting busted the first time didn't seem to stop you, so I fully expect the trend to continue.
Quite frankly, I'm curious which post of mine you are going to try and twist for a 'gotcha' quote this time...