• We are currently being subjected to a massive wave of spambots. We have temporarily closed registration to new accounts while we clean it up.

D&D General Just sweeping dirty dishes under the rug: D&D, Sexism, and the '70s

Status
Not open for further replies.

Voranzovin

Explorer
I'm not surprised that these discussions tend to become an endless morass, because the subject matter couldn't be more conducive to having one's rational thought overwhelmed by the lizard brain.

I'll use myself as an example. My first, gut level reaction to these two images wasn't at all rational. My first reaction was to say to myself, "Self, what the hell? You think that second image is attractive, don't you? Why do you keep objectifying women? You're just like one of those people." Followed by a very familiar internal debate, in which my self attempts to convince myself that I could avoid accidental misogyny if I could just somehow repress my attraction to women. This does not work, of course, and never has.

I had this gut-level reaction even though I know perfectly well that nobody is suggesting that my personal reaction to a drawing has anything to do with the history of sexism in DnD, that attraction and objectification are two different things (although, to be honest, I doubt my personal ability to tell them apart effectively), and that somehow becoming less straight would do absolutely nothing to help women who experience sexism.

I expect that if I were a different person, that lizard brain reaction could manifest itself differently--it could be outward directed anger, rather then inward directed shame, for instance. Both are equally useless, but when people think their sexuality is being attacked--even, or perhaps especially, when it is not in fact being attacked--they do not necessarily react usefully or rationally.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


Mannahnin

Scion of Murgen (He/Him)
I expect that if I were a different person, that lizard brain reaction could manifest itself differently--it could be outward directed anger, rather then inward directed shame, for instance. Both are equally useless, but when people think their sexuality is being attacked--even, or perhaps especially, when it is not in fact being attacked--they do not necessarily react usefully or rationally.
This is a really nice, thoughtful take.
 

haakon1

Legend
Except bards, of course. Choices is good, so long as that choice is not a bard.
Last night in my email campaign, a separated lone PC trying to find new recruits asked a barbarian in a pub to trade war stories. Her reply: “I’m not a bard!”

I described her as large, loud, eating large amounts of chicken and beer, and wearing leather armor and furs. Seems to me to paint a clear picture.
 

Snarf Zagyg

Notorious Liquefactionist
Supporter
Last night in my email campaign, a separated lone PC trying to find new recruits asked a barbarian in a pub to trade war stories. Her reply: “I’m not a bard!”

I described her as large, loud, eating large amounts of chicken and beer, and wearing leather armor and furs. Seems to me to paint a clear picture.

I've always been a big fan of collective nouns (a murmuration of swallows, a murder of ravens, an obstinacy of buffaloes) and I was wondering why we didn't have a similar system for D&D?

I therefore propose that a group of bards is called as I see 'em....

1733510227493.png


A graveyard of bards.


I KID! Like I would bother burying 'em.
 


Snarf Zagyg

Notorious Liquefactionist
Supporter
Now that's what Snarf would also call an Ecstasy of Gold, amiright?

Or is that what you'd pay for it?

Pay? Pay someone to kill bards? That's like saying I would pay someone to drink gin.

Why would I pay for something I enjoy doing so much?????
 

Mannahnin

Scion of Murgen (He/Him)
Pay? Pay someone to kill bards? That's like saying I would pay someone to drink gin.

Why would I pay for something I enjoy doing so much?????
Kill?

I meant pay for the graveyard. So they're not left stinking up the place and you don't have to get your hands dirty.
 


el-remmen

Moderator Emeritus
Some were grown women (mother, aunt, grandmother) who said things along the lines of "why can't you do normal things" and "that's just devil worship". Some were classmates who definitely were not mature enough to be considered women.

Just wanted to make that distinction of the various maturity levels.

I appreciated you post and your willingness to change but. . .

While I am not gonna be as jerky about it as some other posters, I am gonna suggest reconsidering your use of "female" in that way. I get that you were talking about mixed ages, but 1. "women and girls" works fine, and 2. "female" is an adjective, and when used as a noun to refer to people who can be identified (as opposed to a police report description, "tall white female dressed in a light blue sweater carrying a knife") it not only comes off as detached and clinical, it serves to reduce a person to biological sex and also potentially exclude non-binary folks.

Just something to consider. There are definitely places that go into more depth about it than I have (or can) here, if you do a little digging around.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top