Dragonlance DRAGONLANCE LIVES! Unearthed Arcana Explores Heroes of Krynn!

The latest Unearthed Arcana has arrived and the 6-page document contains rules for kender, lunar magic, Knights of Solamnia, and Mages of High Sorcery. In today’s Unearthed Arcana, we explore character options from the Dragonlance setting. This playtest document presents the kender race, the Lunar Magic sorcerer subclass, the Knight of Solamnia and Mage of High Sorcery backgrounds, and a...

The latest Unearthed Arcana has arrived and the 6-page document contains rules for kender, lunar magic, Knights of Solamnia, and Mages of High Sorcery.

Dragonlance.jpg


In today’s Unearthed Arcana, we explore character options from the Dragonlance setting. This playtest document presents the kender race, the Lunar Magic sorcerer subclass, the Knight of Solamnia and Mage of High Sorcery backgrounds, and a collection of new feats, all for use in Dungeons & Dragons.


Kender have a (surprisingly magical) ability to pull things out of a bag, and a supernatural taunt feature. This magical ability appears to replace the older 'kleptomania' description -- "Unknown to most mortals, a magical phenomenon surrounds a kender. Spurred by their curiosity and love for trinkets, curios, and keepsakes, a kender’s pouches or pockets will be magically filled with these objects. No one knows where these objects come from, not even the kender. This has led many kender to be mislabeled as thieves when they fish these items out of their pockets."

Lunar Magic is a sorcerer subclass which draws power from the moon(s); there are notes for using it in Eberron.

Also included are feats such as Adepts of the Black, White, and Red Robes, and Knights of the Sword, Rose, and Crown.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Here is a better idea, let them pull any item from any PC/NPC inventory within X feet as a bonus action. Grant a saving throw or opposed skill check for unwilling targets. The problem with Kender isn’t the ability to steal things, it’s how they are unrepentant kleptomaniacs that refuse to even acknowledge what they are doing. Being able to “grab” a healing potion from the bard on the other side of the wall to heal the downed cleric is a good thing.
Oh I approve of this!
 

log in or register to remove this ad

why cast Counterspell on the Fireball, when you can just ward one target for an average of 10 damage instead?
Because no one competent is going to only hit one target with a fireball?
Divinely Favored / Initiate of High Sorcery
These feats are basically the same, with the exception of the High Sorcery being tied to a Background.

They are a weaker Magic Initiate, the spell selection is locked behind a submenu. And you get only one cantrip. The only upside is you can pick your spellcasting stat.
You kind of missed the bit where it gives anyone Shillelagh with whatever casting stat they like.
Oh, and you can also blow all of your HD on this spell, just because they want to tempt people with bad ideas.
Tempting people with bad ideas is the whole point of Black Robes!
To start off with, you get 15 additional spells known, nearly doubling what a normal PHB sorcerer can grab.
None of them are ones I would choose anyway though.
 

Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
They way I view Gully Dwarves, Tinker Gnomes and Kender - including the other non-human species is that they are not human and therefore can and do think and act very differently to humans. How many threads have popped up where players and even DMs battle to play a demi-human different to a human, where the race is not just a different skin or cosmetic accessory.
That's no excuse. Gully Dwarves are extremely ableist. I honestly cannot fathom anyone not being able to see that. This whole "but they were cursed/BS magic nonsense" stuff is just a Thermian Argument. It doesn't matter. The fact that they exist at all in their original state is the objectionable content, not whatever in-world excuse the designers choose to attach to them to preemptively dismiss any criticism of the races.

Also, the "Humans in Silly Hats" trope can be easily subverted without making all of them bigoted caricatures of real world people or encouraging/mandating problematic behavior when roleplaying those races. This topic was discussed extensively in this thread of mine.

Gully Dwarves are a problem. Tinker Gnomes and Kender less so, but they still are.
 


And you can bet the majority of them have never even touched a DL novel

Yeah if they did they'd say twice as much (kidding
Eberron doesn’t have a strong fey influence, and if all we get for fey in Dragonlance is Kender I’d say we made it out pretty unscathed

Eberron literally has a fey plane that at times twists parts of Eberron.
 

Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
And you can bet the majority of them have never even touched a DL novel
Ooh! Ooh! Pick me! I've touched (and read) multiple Dragonlance novels, and I still hate Kender and would never have allowed them in their previous incarnations at my table.

Anecdotal, I know, but it's certainly better than unfounded speculation about how well read the player base is in order to gatekeep opinions on Kender.
 
Last edited:


Ooh! Ooh! Pick me! I've touched (and read) multiple Dragonlance novels, and I still hate Kender and would never have allowed them in their previous incarnations at my table.

Anecdotal, I know, but it's certainly better than unfounded speculation about how well read the player base is in order to gatekeep opinions on Kender.
Yup, I've read them too, which is why I know how flawed they are. I wouldn't comment if I didn't know the novels/modules/setting books. Not that I've ever had to ban a kender, because I have never met anyone who wanted to play one, but I certainly think Tasslehoff Burfoot makes Jar Jar Binks look like the most loveable character ever.
 
Last edited:

DarkCrisis

Reeks of Jedi
Ooh! Ooh! Pick me! I've touched (and read) multiple Dragonlance novels, and I still hate Kender and would never have allowed them in their previous incarnations at my table.

Anecdotal, I know, but it's certainly better than unfounded speculation about how well read the player base is in order to gatekeep opinions on Kender.
Hence why I said “majority of”. The problem is people hoping onto a bandwagon simple about an issue they only have a surface level knowledge of. So the post obviously wasn’t about you, despite you attempting to make it about you.
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top