Demetrios1453
Legend
I know that Elminster was mentioned as an ancestor, but was it specifically stated that he was this particular ancestor?It was Elminster. I remember noting that when it was mentioned.
I know that Elminster was mentioned as an ancestor, but was it specifically stated that he was this particular ancestor?It was Elminster. I remember noting that when it was mentioned.
Hmmm, Shadowdark uses a similar magic system and could use a druid class
No it was not. In fact he called the ancestor his Great Grandfather and gave him a name but I can't remember it.I know that Elminster was mentioned as an ancestor, but was it specifically stated that he was this particular ancestor?
Deciding he has a bunch of class levels and a specific subclass because he's a Harper when he doesn't do anything is silly.rogue maybe. not a commoner. Not as a Harper.
Oh! I don't think that the one who appeared in the visions was Elminster. I got the impression it was an intermediate ancestor.I know that Elminster was mentioned as an ancestor, but was it specifically stated that he was this particular ancestor?
Agreed.Oh! I don't think that the one who appeared in the visions was Elminster. I got the impression it was an intermediate ancestor.
Yeah, the sound mix made it hard to hear, but he didn't say "Elminster." When this gets released on digital/DVD, we'll see what the captions say, but if they were going to bring in Elminster, they would have made sure we knew, since they waved a flag back and forth every time they mentioned other important IP.Oh! I don't think that the one who appeared in the visions was Elminster. I got the impression it was an intermediate ancestor.
Ed's wife died last year, they were married for 45 years.there's always Ed Greenwood - he's only 63 last I checked, which is almost horrifyingly young compared to what I assumed. I suspect he may be a little too naughty for them to want to draw attention to though - even though AFAIK it's always been in a progressive way (but er... still more progressive than society allows given how fond he is of polyamory
I don't think @Ruin Explorer was saying Ed was a bad guy because of what he expresses in his art. You are bringing that to the table yourself.Ed's wife died last year, they were married for 45 years.
Suggesting that because he wrote about all sorts of open and varied relationships in the realms, that it reflects upon himself as a man,
for you to say he was "naughty" and fond of polyamory... that is a rather disingenuous and more than a little weird take.
And no "at least in his art" does not release you from what are trying to foist upon a real person in a real world. Grow up.
That would be similar to accusing George R.R. Martin of enjoying SA.
I didn't say that he did. Try to read a little more carefully next time.I don't think @Ruin Explorer was saying Ed was a bad guy because of what he expresses in his art. You are bringing that to the table yourself.