D&D (2024) All 48 Player’s Handbook 2024 Subclasses

The new Player's Handbook contains 12 character classes, each with 4 subclasses, making 48 in total.

• Barbarian: Path of the... Berserker, Wild Heart, World Tree, Zealot.
• Bard: College of... Dance, Gamour, Lore, Valor.
• Cleric: Life, Light, Trickery, War domains.
• Druid: Circle of the... Land, Moon, Sea, Stars.
• Fighter: Battle Master, Champion, Eldritch Knight, Psi Warrior.
• Monk: Warrior of... Mercy, Shadow, The Elements, The Open Hand.
• Paladin: Oath of... Devotion, Glory, The Ancients, Vengeance.
• Ranger: Beast Master, Fey Wanderer, Gloom Stalker, Hunter.
• Rogue: Arcane Trickster, Assassin, Soulknife, Thief.
• Sorcerer: Aberrant Sorcery, Clockwork Sorcery, Draconic Sorcery, Wild Magic.
• Warlock: Archfey Patron, Celestial Patron, Fiend Patron, Great Old One Patron.
• Wizard: Abjurer, Diviner, Evoker, Illusionist.

 

[Scribe]

I was never going to be happy with this list and complaining about it here is not going to help.

Give me the will power to keep deleting my rants and to recognize that different folks like different things and no matter how much I hate X or Y these make folks happy.

Stay strong. I'm right there with you deleting my own posts.

 

[Weiley31]

Not a bad selection.
Clockwork sorcerer to counterbalance the aberrant sorcerer is a good choice.
Celestial warlock is a bit odd from a worldbuilding perspective. Why would celestial powers create a warlock instead of a cleric or paladin?

Be not afraid

 

[UngainlyTitan]

I like to read your rants. So please don't stop. Gives me a lot insight into different view points.
I wanted to like the joke, because it seemed like some appreciation of the discussins with you. But I refrain from it now.

Rants are fine as long as they are not spammed on every thread or derail another conversation, however, short statements of negation or preference do nothing to add to the conversation. One would be better off starting a poll on the topic and making a conversation about the topic.

 

[UngainlyTitan]

I have to admit a viscerally negative reaction to the term "psionic magic," but I know that is just because have long embraced the idea that psionics is not magic, not because it is some inherent definition. But I probably won't be allowing any psionic classes/subclasses in games in my current setting anyway.

Funny enough, I have long regarded psionics as a code for magic by Sci Fi people who are snobbish about fantasy.

 

[Aldarc]

Funny enough, I have long regarded psionics as a code for magic by Sci Fi people who are snobbish about fantasy.

To me, psionics has become more of an aesthetic and set of accompanying tropes, which I happen to enjoy in science-fiction, science-fantasy, and fantasy alike.

 

[bedir than]

I like the presentation on this page. It should help relatively new people choose their class without them having to start by reading every class.

 

[UngainlyTitan]

To me, psionics has become more of an aesthetic and set of accompanying tropes, which I happen to enjoy in science-fiction, science-fantasy, and fantasy alike.

Fair enough but to me it looks like another form of magic.

 

[Micah Sweet]

I like to read your rants. So please don't stop. Gives me a lot insight into different view points.
I wanted to like the joke, because it seemed like some appreciation of the discussins with you. But I refrain from it now.

Fair enough. I was overly sensitive due to an unrelated exchange earlier this morning. My apologies @Oofta .

 

[Argyle King]

For the record, I do 100% want that.

Different people like different things.

 

[Aldarc]

Fair enough but to me it looks like another form of magic.

It is, but I'm not bothered by that as I can be quite reasonable. Where I usually take umbrage is when some people take the "it's just magic" argument to then conclude that psionics aren't necessary for D&D (because wizard or whatever) or that there shouldn't be a psion. If there is room for the sorcerer, bard, and warlock, then I think that there is room for a psion.