that's okay, I forgot to memorize it too.We're all heavily enspelled, dispel seams to be good tacticsI didn't prepare any, idiot
Uh-oh, indeed.
I would say that killing a demonstrated DIABOLICALLY EVIL person who practices Necromancy (raising of the dead into Zombies, for instance) is a Lawful act, no matter what. The penalty under law for Necromancy is death in most kingdoms. Plus, she's in the middle of helping to slaughter innocents, through the use of an undead horde. Being flippant about it isn't a big deal. Especially if the deity you worship has any war or combat aspects.
I look at it this way, Quinn is acting to protect a community that has welcomed him and made him a knight. The people he's protecting would view what he did as not only justifiable, but also necessary. In the past, the people of the area saw previous rook attacks as just the normal dangers of living in the region, but now they know the cultists have been sending the rooks to attack them on purpose.List of crimes being committed:
1. Demonic worship.
2. Raising of the dead.
3. Attacking the town of Carnell, which includes:
a. Attacking the citizenry.
b. Attacking the government (Lady P and the town militia)
c. Killing innocent citizens.
d. Killing militia members and other government representatives.
4. Committing (through the actions above) an act of WAR.
I'd say that no one in their right mind would think it unlawful to kill these cretins with extreme prejudice.
@Knightfall, care to weigh in?![]()