TSR The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR

Because the Saga of TSR3 has been ongoing for a while, with many landmarks, I thought I'd do a quick timeline for those who haven't had the time (or, frankly, inclination) to keep up with the whole palaver.

As multiple entities refer to themselves as TSR, I will use the nomenclature (1), (2) etc. to distinguish them. However, all the companies below simply use the term "TSR".

The principle people involved with this story are Ernie Gygax (one of Gary Gygax's children), Justin LaNasa (a tattooist, weapon designer, and briefly a politician who refers to himself as Sir Justin LaNasa*), Stephen Dinehart (co-creator of Giantlands with James Ward), and -- later -- Michael K. Hovermale, TSR3's PR officer.

Also linked to TSR3 is the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin. Much of TSR3’s commercial business appears to be conducted via the museum.

65B1E080-EEE9-45DD-AC2C-C55BD9DB6104.jpeg

gencon.jpeg
  • Late June 2021. TSR3 embarks on an astonishing social media campaign where they tell people who don't like Gary Gygax not to play D&D, call a trans person on Twitter 'disgusting', thank the 'woke' because sales are up, insult Luke Gygax, and more. They also block or insult those who question them on Twitter.
  • Late June 2021. Various companies distance themselves from TSR3, including Gen Con, TSR2 (who rebrand themselves Solarian Games), GAMA, and various individuals such as Luke Gygax, Tim Kask, Jeff Dee, and more. TSR3 responds to being banned from Gen Con by claiming that they created the convention.
tsr_tweets.jpg
  • June 30th 2021. TSR3 blames the widespread pushback it is getting on WotC, accusing it of mounting a coordinated assault on them. In the same tweets they claim that they created the TTRPG business. Ernie Gygax and Stephen Dinehart then deactivate their Twitter accounts. Months later it transpires that this is the date they received a C&D from WotC regarding their use of their IP.
dineharttweet.png
dinebreakup.jpeg
concon.jpg
fr.jpeg
1639501994946.png
  • December 11th 2021. The president of the Gygax Memorial fund publicly declares that they were never consulted, and would refuse any donation from TSR3's crowdfunding campaign. TSR3 quietly removes the references to the GMF from the IndieGoGo page.
  • December 29th 2021. TSR3.5 refiles its lawsuit, this time in the correct jurisdiction. LaNasa and TSR ask for a trial by Jury.
lanasa.jpg
  • January 8th 2020. Wonderfiled[sic]'s Stephen Dinehart threatens to sue Twitter user David Flor for his negative review of Giantlands on the platform.
  • January 10th 2022. TSR3's Justin LaNasa sends TSR alumn Tim Kask a profane message, telling him to "Go suck Lukes/wotc/balls you f*****g coward" and accusing him of having been fired from TSR for stealing.
  • January 11th 2022. Michael K Hovermale claims that the first edition of TSR3's Star Frontiers: New Genesis game was released and has sold out. He says “It was a very small limited run released and sold on the DHSM [Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum] website. It is no longer available, and probably won’t be reprinted.” As yet, nobody has publicly revealed that they bought a copy.
  • January 14th 2022. Michael K. Hovermale resigns as TSR3's Chief Creative Officer and Public Relations Officer after 6 months in the position.
  • March 4th 2022. WotC strikes back with a lawsuit naming TSR, Justin LaNasa personally, and the Dungeon Hobby Shop museum. WotC seeks a judgement that TSR hand over all domains, take down all websites, pay treble damages and costs, hand over all stock and proceeds related to the trademarks, and more. TSR has 21 days to respond.
lawsuitwotctsr.png
  • March 22nd 2022. TSR gets an extension on that WoTC suit. Two waivers of service of summons granted to both Justin LaNasa and the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. He now has 60 days from March 4th to serve an answer or motion, or suffer default judgment.
  • March 26th 2022. TSR CON takes place at the same time as Gary Con. TSR claims " lol, actually we asked just about every one of the 800 people stopping by, TSR CON, and about 60% had no idea Gary con was going on, and we tried pushing them to go over and attend."
  • March 28th 2022. TSR3 posts images of 'rebound' copies of AD&D 1E books it is selling for $650 each.
  • May 17th 2022. Evidence emerges of Nazi connections via TSR3's Dave Johnson. Public Twitter posts include concentrated hateful imagery and messages over a long period of time.
  • May 17th 2022. DriveThruRPG removes all Dave Johnson Games titles from the platform.
  • May 17th 2022. A jury trial date is set for the TSR/WotC lawsuit for October 2023 (few suits like this actually make it to trial in the end).
Screen Shot 2022-01-14 at 10.10.12 AM.png

  • July 19th 2022. A leaked version of a beta version of TSR's 'Star Frontiers: New Genesis' game emerges on the internet. The content includes racist and white-supremacist propaganda, including character races with ability caps based on ethnicity, and various homophobic and transphobic references. Justin LaNasa immediately threatened to sue blogger Eric Tenkar, who shared the information publicly ('Mario Real' is one of LaNasa's online pseudonyms). Various evidence points towards the document's genuine nature, including an accidentally revealed Google drive belonging to NuTSR.
  • July 22nd 2022. A video shows a Google Drive that appears to be owned by nuTSR, which contains a list of enemies of the company, usually with the word "WOKE" in caps being used as a pejorative.
FYDaZwYXkAsdjW0.jpeg

(screenshot courtesy of the @nohateingaming Twitter account)

  • August 30th 2022. Wizard Tower Games announces that they have received a subpeona from WotC regarding TSR and Justin LaNasa. Former NuTSR employee Michaal K Hovermale confirms that he has also received a subpeona.
  • September 5th 2022. Justin LaNasa sends out customer data, including addresses and credit card numbers. LaNasa responds by publicly claiming the evidence is photoshopped and slandering those who revealed it as liars.
  • September 8th 2022. WoTC files an injunction to prevent LaNasa or his companies from “publishing, distributing, or otherwise making available Star Frontiers New Genesis or any iteration of the game using the Marks”.
  • June 8th 2023. NuTSR files for bankruptcy. The case between WotC and NuTSR is postponed until March 2024.

Have I missed anything important? I'll continue updating this as I remember things, or as people remind me of things!

To the best of my knowledge, TSR3 is not actually selling any type of gaming product.

*if anybody has any link to LaNasa's knighthood, please let me know!

Websites
Various websites have come and gone. I'll try to make some sense of it here so you know what site you're actually visiting!
  • TSR.com is the original TSR website. For a long time it redirected to WotC. The URL is no longer in use. (WotC)
  • TSRgames.com was TSR2 until summer 2021. The site is still running, although TSR2 is now called Solarian Games. (Jayson Elliot)
  • TSR.games was TSR3 until summer 2021. It now goes to Wonderfiled(sic)'s website. (Stephen Dinehart)
  • TSR-hobbies.com is TSR 3.5, launched summer 2021 by Justin LaNasa and Ernie Gygax. (Justin LaNasa)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

IANAL, but I've been in courtrooms a relatively large number of times. I think the general public would be shocked to the degree that each courtroom is a judge's fiefdom. I've seen people kicked out for not wearing a tie, pulling out their phone to turn off notifications, etc.

Some of this is judges being petty and self-important, but you're just a spectator on what might be the most important day of someone else's life, and treating that with respect and not potentially interfering with proceedings is also important.

I think it's great for the public to go -- it's really educational and you'll quickly realize how much fiction has given you an inaccurate idea of how the justice system works -- but be on your absolute best behavior.
I think the thing to do is to be a judge. Then, nobody can kick you out for going to court in your underwear.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


I was on the jury for a murder trial, and to be honest, I was surprised at how similar the experience was to something like Law & Order. Fewer dramatic objections and more powerpoint presentations and handouts, but otherwise not as wildly inaccurate as I was expecting it to be.
 


I got put on a case, where it seemed clearly to me the guy was guilty based on the evidence presented, but most of the rest of the jury was dead-set on acquittal, since the only witnesses were police officers and they didn't trust the police. I finally caved in, so as not to be away from work for more than the one week it took to get to that point, as my boss was threatening me with dismissal. After the verdict was announced, the judge brought us into his chambers and let the jury see evidence that had been deemed inadmissible -- it pretty clearly painted the guy as guilty, and a repeat offender.

In the years since, I've come to terms with it. Not my proudest moment, caving to the majority. And I question showing the jury evidence that has been deemed inadmissible afterwards -- the time for evidence is during the trial, don't burden people afterwards. But I can also understand ACAB. So, it's moot. But it bothers me. What if he killed somebody during the course of a later crime? That's my fault -- not entirely, but I share blame.
 

... After the verdict was announced, the judge brought us into his chambers and let the jury see evidence that had been deemed inadmissible -- it pretty clearly painted the guy as guilty, and a repeat offender.

... What if he killed somebody during the course of a later crime? That's my fault -- not entirely, but I share blame.

No, it is not your fault. At all.
That evidence was inadmissible for reasons.
 

I was also once in court when I almost accidentally got married, but that's a whole other story.

I suppose I can't just leave this hanging out here without a follow up.

This has nothing to do with nuTSR! But anyway.

Twenty-cough years ago my then-fiancée and I wanted to find a judge to officiate at a wedding for us. Neither of us is religious, but we wanted something more than just the marriage license, so we knew we were going to have ceremony with the dress and the flowers and dad walking daughter down the aisle and "by the power vested in me", etc.

We have some friends who are lawyers, and they recommended a judge they knew in the area. We scheduled an appointment with her, I'll call her Judge Brown and after she met with us and heard our ask, OH NO! THE PRINCESS IS IN ANOTHER CASTLE! Judge Brown was no longer doing weddings. But, she said, she had a colleague in the same building who she thought would be perfect.

I'm going to call him Judge Fitzpatrick (not his real name) just to make this story a bit easier to follow.

"OK, thanks," I said, "Should we schedule a meeting for next week with Judge Fitzpatrick?"

Judge Brown replied, "No need for that. Just go down to courtroom #3, I'll phone ahead and tell him you're coming."

So my then-fiancée and I go down to courtroom #3. This is the court of common pleas so there are a lot people there, a court reporter, a bailiff, I think a few attorneys, it was honestly kind of a madhouse. We kind of uncertainly sit down and wait.

About 5 minutes later, "All rise for the Honorable Judge Fitzpatrick!" He sweeps into the courtroom looking regal in his robe with his silver hair and beard, like central casting for trustworthy judge.

Various people start going up to him but he says, "Hold on! Where's my couple who wants to get married?"

Turns out Judge Fitzpatrick was going to perform the ceremony right there in that courtroom while making everyone else wait. We hastily explained, no, we were hoping to having him officiate at our wedding ~11 months from then.

A good laugh was had by all and yes, 11 months later, he officiated at our wedding.

Fun fact: it was the last wedding he ever officiated because a few days later (we were married at the very end of December) he started his term as a Federal Judge who, I guess, don't do weddings because those are a state function? (I'm sure Snarf will correct me where I'm wrong.)

Anyway that's the story of how I almost accidentally got married while observing court proceedings.
 

I got put on a case, where it seemed clearly to me the guy was guilty based on the evidence presented, but most of the rest of the jury was dead-set on acquittal, since the only witnesses were police officers and they didn't trust the police. I finally caved in, so as not to be away from work for more than the one week it took to get to that point, as my boss was threatening me with dismissal. After the verdict was announced, the judge brought us into his chambers and let the jury see evidence that had been deemed inadmissible -- it pretty clearly painted the guy as guilty, and a repeat offender.

In the years since, I've come to terms with it. Not my proudest moment, caving to the majority. And I question showing the jury evidence that has been deemed inadmissible afterwards -- the time for evidence is during the trial, don't burden people afterwards. But I can also understand ACAB. So, it's moot. But it bothers me. What if he killed somebody during the course of a later crime? That's my fault -- not entirely, but I share blame.
Should've stuck to your guns until your boss fired you. Then cleaned him out for wrongful termination.
 

Should've stuck to your guns until your boss fired you. Then cleaned him out for wrongful termination.
... "Wrongful termination"? What is that? I don't think we have that in the US. At least, not after this administration...

Speaking seriously, I work in a "Right to Work" state, which means they can let you go at any time for any reason.
 

Speaking seriously, I work in a "Right to Work" state, which means they can let you go at any time for any reason.

Not quite. There are still (at least for now) reasons they cannot fire you - like, say, the color of your skin.

Anyone with a lick of sense will be silent as to reason, or give a solid fake one. But if you can demonstrate sufficient evidence that it was for an invalid reason (like, say, you're a person of color, the boss was using racial slurs in office communications, and you called him on it and he fired you, and you kept the e-mails) then that can be very bad for them, legally speaking
 

Trending content

Related Articles

Remove ads

Trending content

Remove ads

Top