TSR The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR

Because the Saga of TSR3 has been ongoing for a while, with many landmarks, I thought I'd do a quick timeline for those who haven't had the time (or, frankly, inclination) to keep up with the whole palaver.

As multiple entities refer to themselves as TSR, I will use the nomenclature (1), (2) etc. to distinguish them. However, all the companies below simply use the term "TSR".

The principle people involved with this story are Ernie Gygax (one of Gary Gygax's children), Justin LaNasa (a tattooist, weapon designer, and briefly a politician who refers to himself as Sir Justin LaNasa*), Stephen Dinehart (co-creator of Giantlands with James Ward), and -- later -- Michael K. Hovermale, TSR3's PR officer.

Also linked to TSR3 is the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin. Much of TSR3’s commercial business appears to be conducted via the museum.

65B1E080-EEE9-45DD-AC2C-C55BD9DB6104.jpeg

gencon.jpeg
  • Late June 2021. TSR3 embarks on an astonishing social media campaign where they tell people who don't like Gary Gygax not to play D&D, call a trans person on Twitter 'disgusting', thank the 'woke' because sales are up, insult Luke Gygax, and more. They also block or insult those who question them on Twitter.
  • Late June 2021. Various companies distance themselves from TSR3, including Gen Con, TSR2 (who rebrand themselves Solarian Games), GAMA, and various individuals such as Luke Gygax, Tim Kask, Jeff Dee, and more. TSR3 responds to being banned from Gen Con by claiming that they created the convention.
tsr_tweets.jpg
  • June 30th 2021. TSR3 blames the widespread pushback it is getting on WotC, accusing it of mounting a coordinated assault on them. In the same tweets they claim that they created the TTRPG business. Ernie Gygax and Stephen Dinehart then deactivate their Twitter accounts. Months later it transpires that this is the date they received a C&D from WotC regarding their use of their IP.
dineharttweet.png
dinebreakup.jpeg
concon.jpg
fr.jpeg
1639501994946.png
  • December 11th 2021. The president of the Gygax Memorial fund publicly declares that they were never consulted, and would refuse any donation from TSR3's crowdfunding campaign. TSR3 quietly removes the references to the GMF from the IndieGoGo page.
  • December 29th 2021. TSR3.5 refiles its lawsuit, this time in the correct jurisdiction. LaNasa and TSR ask for a trial by Jury.
lanasa.jpg
  • January 8th 2020. Wonderfiled[sic]'s Stephen Dinehart threatens to sue Twitter user David Flor for his negative review of Giantlands on the platform.
  • January 10th 2022. TSR3's Justin LaNasa sends TSR alumn Tim Kask a profane message, telling him to "Go suck Lukes/wotc/balls you f*****g coward" and accusing him of having been fired from TSR for stealing.
  • January 11th 2022. Michael K Hovermale claims that the first edition of TSR3's Star Frontiers: New Genesis game was released and has sold out. He says “It was a very small limited run released and sold on the DHSM [Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum] website. It is no longer available, and probably won’t be reprinted.” As yet, nobody has publicly revealed that they bought a copy.
  • January 14th 2022. Michael K. Hovermale resigns as TSR3's Chief Creative Officer and Public Relations Officer after 6 months in the position.
  • March 4th 2022. WotC strikes back with a lawsuit naming TSR, Justin LaNasa personally, and the Dungeon Hobby Shop museum. WotC seeks a judgement that TSR hand over all domains, take down all websites, pay treble damages and costs, hand over all stock and proceeds related to the trademarks, and more. TSR has 21 days to respond.
lawsuitwotctsr.png
  • March 22nd 2022. TSR gets an extension on that WoTC suit. Two waivers of service of summons granted to both Justin LaNasa and the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum. He now has 60 days from March 4th to serve an answer or motion, or suffer default judgment.
  • March 26th 2022. TSR CON takes place at the same time as Gary Con. TSR claims " lol, actually we asked just about every one of the 800 people stopping by, TSR CON, and about 60% had no idea Gary con was going on, and we tried pushing them to go over and attend."
  • March 28th 2022. TSR3 posts images of 'rebound' copies of AD&D 1E books it is selling for $650 each.
  • May 17th 2022. Evidence emerges of Nazi connections via TSR3's Dave Johnson. Public Twitter posts include concentrated hateful imagery and messages over a long period of time.
  • May 17th 2022. DriveThruRPG removes all Dave Johnson Games titles from the platform.
  • May 17th 2022. A jury trial date is set for the TSR/WotC lawsuit for October 2023 (few suits like this actually make it to trial in the end).
Screen Shot 2022-01-14 at 10.10.12 AM.png

  • July 19th 2022. A leaked version of a beta version of TSR's 'Star Frontiers: New Genesis' game emerges on the internet. The content includes racist and white-supremacist propaganda, including character races with ability caps based on ethnicity, and various homophobic and transphobic references. Justin LaNasa immediately threatened to sue blogger Eric Tenkar, who shared the information publicly ('Mario Real' is one of LaNasa's online pseudonyms). Various evidence points towards the document's genuine nature, including an accidentally revealed Google drive belonging to NuTSR.
  • July 22nd 2022. A video shows a Google Drive that appears to be owned by nuTSR, which contains a list of enemies of the company, usually with the word "WOKE" in caps being used as a pejorative.
FYDaZwYXkAsdjW0.jpeg

(screenshot courtesy of the @nohateingaming Twitter account)

  • August 30th 2022. Wizard Tower Games announces that they have received a subpeona from WotC regarding TSR and Justin LaNasa. Former NuTSR employee Michaal K Hovermale confirms that he has also received a subpeona.
  • September 5th 2022. Justin LaNasa sends out customer data, including addresses and credit card numbers. LaNasa responds by publicly claiming the evidence is photoshopped and slandering those who revealed it as liars.
  • September 8th 2022. WoTC files an injunction to prevent LaNasa or his companies from “publishing, distributing, or otherwise making available Star Frontiers New Genesis or any iteration of the game using the Marks”.
  • June 8th 2023. NuTSR files for bankruptcy. The case between WotC and NuTSR is postponed until March 2024.

Have I missed anything important? I'll continue updating this as I remember things, or as people remind me of things!

To the best of my knowledge, TSR3 is not actually selling any type of gaming product.

*if anybody has any link to LaNasa's knighthood, please let me know!

Websites
Various websites have come and gone. I'll try to make some sense of it here so you know what site you're actually visiting!
  • TSR.com is the original TSR website. For a long time it redirected to WotC. The URL is no longer in use. (WotC)
  • TSRgames.com was TSR2 until summer 2021. The site is still running, although TSR2 is now called Solarian Games. (Jayson Elliot)
  • TSR.games was TSR3 until summer 2021. It now goes to Wonderfiled(sic)'s website. (Stephen Dinehart)
  • TSR-hobbies.com is TSR 3.5, launched summer 2021 by Justin LaNasa and Ernie Gygax. (Justin LaNasa)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Believe it or not I had to do 12 weeks of study on the idea of if we can trust the dictionary or the "ordinary usage"... and that was just regarding the wording in a statute.

In defamation terms, this falls under "opinion" where someone can argue that it's their "opinion" that someone is (fact).

Generally in these circumstance, the main factors are what information the person gives as the basis for their opinion - and also what that person's general position in society is. If a judge says someone's a criminal, that's considered more substantial than if a random homeless person says you are, if someone cites a report for someone who has the same full name and date of birth as you that's good evidence, etc.

This is why I describe these kinds of defences as "messy"
Sure. And this is why relying on article 15s is even more flimsy, because of all the reasons I mentioned (non-judicial, no admission of guilt, only covers UCMJ which has separate rules than civilian laws, no conviction, etc.). An assault under UCMJ can be if a higher rank pushed you and you pushed them back. You wouldn’t see that as a criminal issue in the civilian world I’m guessing. Most courts would rule that self defense if I were a betting man, even if it went to court (which I doubt). But the military? Lots of special rules to enforce chain of command and authority of leadership.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Bolded is important. Found liable by whom? A judge presumably, right? That’s what I keep mentioning about article 15s that is super important. It’s non-judicial. It’s a company commander saying “I think you did this”. There is no proof of a crime being committed.

Also see my earlier post, if you’re going to use that definition, then we’re all criminals.
I mean...

Speak for yourself! I'm pure and innocent of all wrongdoing ever!
 

All of this will be moot anyway, because at the rate he’s been going, it’s gonna be a civilian title he’ll earn as well….if the courts or lawyers decided to pursue. Between failing to pay taxes, using different aliases to bypass campaign contribution limits, and all his businesses overlapping revenue methods, I would not be surprised to see some legal shenanigans there.
 

And this is why relying on article 15s is even more flimsy, because of all the reasons I mentioned (non-judicial, no admission of guilt, only covers UCMJ which has separate rules than civilian laws, no conviction, etc.).

And that's kind of the point.

If someone who has extensive military experience says and article 15s means someone is a criminal, there's a good argument to be made that you know that's nonsense. Obviously if the person was a lawyer in the military this goes 10,000%.

If a life long civilian stated that Justin was a criminal because he was discharged at PV1 and their explanation is the military would only do that if they were covering up that he was a serial criminal because (cut to long rant about corruption, citing conspiracy theories etc) then they can be considered to hold that as a legitimate opinion... not because it makes sense, but because well it's part and package of that individual.

This is how we get weirdos insisting that random politicians are part of a weird occult cabal that drinks the blood of tortured children... because that's just their opinion man. The idea is to ensure people aren't held to absurd levels of accountability, to know things that they had no experience with, etc.

Which is also why defamation suits can easily run into massive money generators for lawyers, as they spend billable hour after billable hour reading everything vaguely related and search databases for if there's ever a precedent for a similar situation... and if so was that appealed or overturned in a later case etc. Hence we got increasing interest in Anti-SLAPP measures (official and unofficial).

All of which is to say it was a really stupid idea for Justin to go in for a defamation case based on this in the first place... given that it would expose so much about him, and raise so much scrutiny about about why someone might believe he is (bad thing). That he's been now accused of perjury due to denying a thing there's a certified record of is just the cherry on top.

Regardless of what he hoped to achieve from a legal perspective - his own actions have done way more potential long term harm to his reputation than anything Tenkar could have put on YouTube... and his lawyer certainly did not help with that.
 


Also see my earlier post, if you’re going to use that definition, then we’re all criminals.
“Criminal” and “illegal” are not synonymous. All criminal acts are illegal, but not all illegal acts are “criminal”.

For an action to be criminal, the actor would have to be vulnerable to adjudication by a criminal court or its equivalent. It’s a completely different legal system, with distinct sets of laws, procedures, standards of proof and penalties.
 

Would you argue that Al Capone was not a criminal before they convicted him of tax evasion?

In the common parlance, a person is a criminal if they have committed a crime. A person is a convicted criminal if they've been convicted of that crime in a court of law. Otherwise, the term "convicted criminal" is useless and redundant.
That is a dangerous position to hold. There are reasons why there is an assumption of innocence in place.

I have seen too many people being judged by the court of the internet.

So please. We should hold certain standards. If experts of military law say, that it is no conviction, then it is. And we can only speak of alleged criminal.
 



When you're dealing with someone who likes to sue for slander/libel, calling them a criminal isn't the best thing to do

Nobody argued that it was the best thing to do.

Not if they were subject to an Article 15. As I mentioned above, accepting an Article 15 is not admission of guilt

Whether it is an admission of guilt is irrelevant. For purposes of the suit, whether it is what a layman would consider sufficient evidence of a crime (again, in a layman's terms) is material.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top